| Chemical Ubiquity - Chemical Here,
Chemical There...

Problem: There are
chemicals everywhere - in our food, in our cosmetics, in our
environment and in us!
Why We Should Care: The
wholesale addition of chemicals to virtually every segment of modern
life is unnatural and causes many problems. From environmental
pollution concerns to the climbing rates of cancer and other chronic
diseases, the proliferation of chemicals in the modern world is
causing many
worrisome trends.
What We Can Do: Buy fresh,
local, simple. Read ingredient lists on food and cosmetic items.
Try to reduce your personal chemical stockpile - the less-processed
the item, the less chemical content it is likely to have.
In Depth: Chemicals are
everywhere. The common definition of "chemical" as a noun is
a
substance that is produced or used in a process (reaction) involving
changes to atoms or molecules. Obviously, with a definition this
broad, not only are chemicals everywhere, they are a natural part of
our world. However, it is only since the beginnings of the
Industrial Revolution that we have been adding synthetic chemicals to
our world at a furious rate, or using natural chemicals in
concentrations or for purposes that are harmful. Rates of
chronic disease are on the rise around the world, and those rates
parallel all too closely the industrialization of our planet.
Obesity, unhealthy diets, and lack of exercise - all now-typical
western lifestyle hallmarks - are contributors to the rise in chronic
disease; however, these factors all rest upon the backdrop of chemical
ubiquity in our world today. Any of us can eat better, exercise
more, and keep our weight down if we choose to do so. Avoiding
chemicals in today's world is much more difficult.
Just check out the
label on virtually any bottle of shampoo. Suave's
"Naturals" Juicy Green Apple shampoo, for example, contains:
Water, Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate, Ammonium Laureth Sulfate, Ammonium
Chloride, Cocamide MEA, Fragrance, PEG-5 Cocamide, Hydroxypropyl
Methylcellulose, Citric Acid, Tetrasodium EDTA, DMDM Hydantoin,
Tocopheryl Acetate, Propylene Glycol, Methylchloroisothiazolinone,
Pyrus Malus Fruit, Methylisothiazolinone, Glycerin, Yellow 5, Blue 1.
Wow. Ten points to anyone who can
actually pronounce everything in this list. And they brand this
"Naturals"?! For comparison's sake, a bottle of Dr. Bronner's
Hemp Almond Pure-Castile Soap (shampoo) contains: Water,
Saponified Organic Coconut and Olive Oils (w/ retained Glycerin),
Organic Hemp Oil, Organic Jojoba Oil, Natural Bitter Almond Fragrance,
Citric Acid, Vitamin E.
No points given out for this one -
normal people can pronounce everything on this list, and probably can
at least imagine where each ingredient comes from. But do the
un-pronounceable ingredients in the Suave shampoo have harmful
effects? Research on the ingredients in the Suave list provided
no conclusive results of known severely harmful effects on humans,
although most of the ingredients have known low-level effects.
However, research did turn up the following facts:
- 98% of all cosmetic products contain
at least one ingredient never publicly assessed for safety [1].
- More than 750 personal care products
sold in the U.S. violate industry safety standards or cosmetic safety
standards in other industrialized countries [1].
- At least 383 products contain
ingredients that are prohibited for use in cosmetics in Canada, Japan,
or the E.U. [1].
In other words, just because an
ingredient is commonly used in the USA and research provides no
results suggesting severely harmful effects, it certainly doesn't mean
the ingredient is safe. It may simply mean that no one in the
USA has taken the time to study it. Given the stature of some of
the previously banned chemicals - carcinogens, neurotoxins, etc. - one
would do well to avoid as many chemicals as possible. Even
brands with natural-sounding names generally contain many typical
chemicals and a healthy dose of marketing - for example, many products
from the Herbal Essences (another misnomer) brand contain chemicals
linked to cancer [2], yet they are still on the market, and often
perceived as "natural".
The chemical problem doesn't stop at
cosmetics. Our industrial food supply uses chemicals liberally
to process our food, to keep it from spoiling, to make bland
industrial food taste better, or simply to make the process cheaper.
Remember the Suave ingredient Propylene Glycol? That ingredient
is also the base of many stick deodorants, is used in antifreeze, and
is used as bug bait and killer. It is also used as an ingredient
in Albertson's Chocolate Chip Cookies. Whatever happened to
cookies being made of butter, flour, and sugar? According to the FDA's website, "Food
additives play a vital role in today's bountiful and nutritious food
supply. They allow our growing urban population to enjoy a variety of
safe, wholesome and tasty foods year-round. And, they make possible an
array of convenience foods without the inconvenience of daily
shopping." Whether today's food supply can be considered
"nutritious" or "safe, wholesome and tasty" is, at the very least, up
for debate. Certainly most of the "array of convenience foods"
fall squarely into the junk food category. Are we willing to
trade truly nutritious, wholesome, and sustaining food for the
"convenience" of frozen TV dinners and pre-baked goods? Thus
far, at least, the answer has been yes. Artificial colors,
artificial flavors, chemical preservatives, alternative sweeteners,
emulsifiers, stabilizers, thickeners - the list of unnecessary
chemicals in food today goes on and on.
The giant food companies - most of
which own several smaller brands that are used to market the same old
foods to more selective buyers - tell us that all those extra
ingredients are perfectly safe, are saving us time, making our food
supply less risky, and making it easier for us to have what we want
when we want it. The governmental agencies which oversee these
sorts of things - the FDA and the USDA, namely - generally echo this
party line. (The question, of course, is whether a food supply
that allows us anything we want at any time, from precious few
controlling companies, is actually desirable in the first place; click
here for more information on our food
system.) But given, once again, the stature of some previously
banned chemicals, we should question the accuracy of what we're being
told. A few examples:
- Green 1, artificial color, banned
1965, caused cancer [3].
- Cyclamate, artificial sweetener,
banned 1970, caused cancer [3].
- Monochloroacetic acid, preservative,
banned 1941, highly toxic [3].
There are many currently used food
additives which have known harmful effects on humans. A few
examples:
- Sodium nitrite and sodium nitrate;
used as preservatives, for coloring, or flavoring; common in cured
meats (bacon, hot dogs, sandwich meats, etc.); linked to cancer [3].
- Saccharin and Aspartame, often known
by their trademarked names (Sweet 'n Low, NutraSweet, Equal); used as
artificial sweeteners; linked to cancer and other side effects [3].
- Potassium Bromate; used in many
flours; banned virtually worldwide except in Japan and USA; bromate
causes cancer [3].
So our cosmetics and our foods are full
of chemicals which have an almost-certain detrimental effect on our
health. Unfortunately, that's not where it stops.
Household cleaners, polishers, detergents, and such? Full of
chemicals. Our houses and cars? Also full of chemicals.
In fact, that "new car smell" is nothing more than the plastics and
glues in the dashboard, upholstery, carpet, and door moldings
outgassing VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds). Same with a new
house - the carpet, paint, wood stain, etc., are all outgassing VOCs,
which are toxic and not particularly good to be breathing in.
With all these chemicals in our
industrialized world, it is no wonder that rates of chronic disease
are on the rise. Our chemical exposure is low-level enough that
in most cases the rate spike cannot be conclusively linked to
chemicals; however, there is a growing body of evidence that our
low-level yet constant exposure to our modern toxic cocktail plays a
major part in the rise of chronic disease. It is also little
wonder, with chemicals being so ubiquitous, that they are making their
way into the natural world. In fact, recent research by the US
Geological Survey found that 80% of streams and 93% of the groundwater
sampled had one or more chemicals that would not naturally be present
[4]. We must not forget that regardless of how disconnected from
the natural world we may be on the surface, we absolutely depend upon
the natural world for our survival. And by polluting the very
water we drink - one of our most basic and necessary resources - we
are initiating a toxic vicious cycle. We've polluted our
immediate environments, which make us sick, and now we're beginning to
pollute the environment as a whole on a scale and to a depth that will
make us sick for years to come, even if we quit using so many
chemicals.
So, what to do? As with any
problem that is so pervasive and multi-faceted, there is no one
solution. To solve the problem of chemical ubiquity, we're going
to have to break our dependence on chemicals, plain and simple.
Read the labels of cosmetics, foods, household cleaners, and other
products. Choose products that are truly natural. Local,
organic food is your best bet to avoid chemicals in food. Or buy
the least-processed ingredients you can and make food yourself.
Natural and safe cosmetics and household cleaners can be found through
companies such as Dr. Bronner's, Tom's of Maine, Seventh Generation,
Melaleuca, and others. Alternative paints, wood stains, and
building materials are readily available today. Check out our
Solutions section for more in-depth
information; and go to our Links page for
links to green companies, organizations, and more!
[1] http://www.ewg.org/node/22610
[2] http://action.safecosmetics.org/action/index.asp?step=2&item=14380
[3]
http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm [4]
http://www.groundwater.org/gi/docs_pack/fa13.pdf |